1.1 Theorem. Let be a closed oriented
three-manifold, whose prime decomposition contains no aspherical
factors. Then for any initial metric on
the solution to the
Ricci flow with surgery becomes extinct in finite time.
Proof for irreducible . Let
denote the
space of all contractible loops in
Given
a riemannian metric
on
and
define
to be the infimum of the areas of all lipschitz maps from
to
whose restriction to
is
For a family
let
be the supremum of
over all
Finally, for a nontrivial homotopy
class
let
be the
infimum of
over all
Since
is
not aspherical, it follows from a classical (and elementary)
result of Serre that such a nontrivial homotopy class exists.
1.2 Lemma. (cf. [H,§11]) If is a smooth
solution to the Ricci flow, then for any
the rate of
change of the function
satisfies the estimate
A rigorous proof of this lemma will be given in §3, but the
idea is simple and can be explained here. Let us assume that at
time the value
is attained by the family
such
that the loops
where
is close to
are
embedded and sufficiently smooth. For each such
consider the
minimal disk
with boundary
and with area
Now
let the metric evolve by the Ricci flow and let the curves
evolve by the curve shortening flow (which moves every point of
the curve in the direction of its curvature vector at this point)
with the same time parameter. Then the rate of change of the area
of
can be computed as
The problem with this argument is that if contains
curves, which are not immersed (for instance, a curve could pass
an arc once in one direction and then make an about turn and pass
the same arc in the opposite direction), then it is not clear how
to define curve shortening flow so that it would be continuous
both in the time parameter and in the family parameter. In §3
we'll explain how to circumvent this difficulty, essentially by
adding one dimension to the ambient manifold. This regularization
of the curve shortening flow has been worked out by Altschuler and
Grayson [A-G] (who were interested in approximating the singular
curve shortening flow on the plane and obtained for that case more
precise results than what we need).
1.3 Now consider the solution to the Ricci flow with
surgery. Since is assumed irreducible, the surgeries are
topologically trivial, that is one of the components of the
post-surgery manifold is diffeomorphic to the pre-surgery
manifold, and all the others are spheres. Moreover, by the
construction of the surgery [P,4.4], the diffeomorphism from the
pre-surgery manifold to the post-surgery one can be chosen to be
distance non-increasing ( more precisely,
-lipschitz,
where
can be made as small as we like). It follows that
the conclusion of the lemma above holds for the solutions to the
Ricci flow with surgery as well.
Now recall that the evolution equation for the scalar curvature
1.4 Remark. The finite time extinction result for
irreducible non-aspherical manifolds already implies (in
conjuction with the work in [P,§1-5] and the Kneser finiteness
theorem) the so called "elliptization conjecture", claiming that a
closed manifold with finite fundamental group is diffeomorphic to
a spherical space form. The analysis of the long time behavior in
[P,§6-8] is not needed in this case; moreover the argument in
[P,§5] can be slightly simplified, replacing the sequences
by single values
since we already have an upper bound on the
extinction time in terms of the initial metric.
In fact, we can even avoid the use of the Kneser theorem. Indeed, if we start from an initial metric on a homotopy sphere (not assumed irreducible), then at each surgery time we have (almost) distance non-increasing homotopy equivalences from the pre-surgery manifold to each of the post-surgery components, and this is enough to keep track of the nontrivial relative homotopy class of the loop space.
1.5 Proof of theorem 1.1 for general .
The Kneser theorem implies that our solution undergoes only
finitely many topologically nontrivial surgeries, so from some
time
on all the surgeries are trivial. Moreover, by the Milnor
uniqueness theorem, each component at time
satisfies the
assumption of the theorem. Since we already know from 1.4 that
there can not be any simply connected prime factors, it follows
that every such component is either irreducible, or has nontrivial
in either case the proof in 1.1-1.3 works.